|
MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING WEB |
|
Sandison, D., S. C. Hansen and R. G. Torok. 2003. Activity-based planning and budgeting: A new approach. Journal of Cost Management (March/April): 16-22. Summary by Adrienne Perez |
The purpose of this article is to introduce
a new approach to budgeting and planning developed by the CAM-I ABPB Interest
Group. The
new method places emphasis on achieving an operational balance first and then a
financial balance. This is more
advantageous than traditional budgeting because it creates a flexible and
dynamic budget model that easily adapts to organizational changes.
The key feature of the new approach is the Closed Loop Model. This model takes individual strategies from initial thought to the final product and allows manipulations of all variables within the process. The following graphic provides an overview of the CAM-I closed loop model.

·
Product demand quality
·
Activity and resource consumption
·
Resource capacity
·
Resource cost
·
Product/service price
The ability to alter the above elements
makes this Model very beneficial for any organization.
Contrasting Traditional and ABPB
Approaches
The following chart contrasts the two
approaches:
|
Limitations
of Traditional Approaches |
Benefits
of the ABPB Process |
|
|
Financial
view only |
Both
operational and financial view |
|
|
Lack
of buy-in from all areas of management |
All
managers are involved on an on-going basis |
|
|
Too
detailed |
Macro
forward-looking approach with detail only when and where required |
|
|
Lack
of confidence in information |
Uses
"hard" operational and resource information to generate the
model |
|
|
Perceived
"gaming" with budget numbers |
Using
an observational model reduces the amount of room for disagreement on
operational and financial information |
|
|
Too
time consuming |
Is
part of an on-going means of proactively managing the organization |
|
|
Too
many iterations |
Iterations
are kept at a macro level and are more meaningful |
Integration with Traditional Budgeting
Process and Other Performance Management Initiatives
ABPB can be used in conjunction with traditional
budgeting process. The best way to
obtain integration is to use the Closed Loop Model for the parts of the organization
that produce identifiable products or services. The Model can also be used for the parts of the organization that have
processes that can be easily mapped. The
parts of the organization that can not be mapped or do not have easily
identifiable products or service can be budgeted using the traditional process.
The main benefit of this new approach to budgeting and planning is
related to the flexibility and dynamic aspect of the model. This aspect allows for a better link to performance management and
accountability. This approach is not
too time consuming because of the proactive and flexible planning involved. The ABPB approach accommodates the dynamic business environment that the
majority of organizations operate in today.
| ABC Main Page | ABM Main Page |
| Budgeting Main Page | CAM-I Main Page |
| Cost Management Main Page | Strategy Related Main Page |