MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING WEB

Maaw Home Contents Bibliography Maaw's Book Books Journals Summaries Marketplace Software Gadgets
Introduction Main Topics Search maaw Grad Course Textbooks Journal Bibs Links Maaw's Blog Videos Contribute

Clinton, B. D. and S. Chen. 1998. Do new performance measures measure up? Management Accounting (October): 38, 40-43.

Summary by Hanna Morales
Master of Accountancy Program
University of South Florida, Summer 2002

Three relatively new performance measures are analyzed and evaluated in this article to examine their correlation with stock prices and stock returns. In addition, the authors examine any truths and/or exaggerations claimed by consulting groups supporting these measurements.  The three measures are:  
 

Measure

Defined

 1. Stern Stewart’s 
     Economic Value Added (EVA®)
 Operating income - Cost of capital
 2. Boston Consulting Group’s 
     Cash Flow Return on Investment
    (CFROI)
 Operating cash flow ÷ Beginning capital
 3. Residual Cash Flow (RCF).    Operating cash flow - Cost of capital

Other measurements analyzed and evaluated include traditionally reported measures such as, Operating Income and Cash Flow, and the traditionally used Return on Investment (ROI). 

The authors selected a sample of 325 firms with the available variables to be analyzed for the years 1991 to 1995. They consistently defined all items of the measurements in order to be comparable then, conducted the correlation analysis to stock prices and stock returns.  The results are summarized in Exhibits 1 & 2.  The correlations are significant at a level of 1%.

EXHIBIT 1
CORRELATIONS OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES WITH STOCK RETURN
(Stock prices are annual closing prices)  

 

All Years

Average

1995

1994

1993

1992

1991

  Sample Size

    1,625

 

    325

    325

    325

    325

    325

  OIt (Operating income after tax per sharet)

0.162

0.265

0.163

0.518

0.477

0.119

0.046

  AOIt (S.S. adjusted operating income after tax per sharet)

0.558

0.544

0.504

0.596

0.580

0.557

0.481

  CFt (Operating cash flow per sharet)

0.550

0.559

0.490

0.587

0.639

0.605

0.473

  RIt (Residual income per sharet)

0.004

-0.012

0.065

0.029

-0.023

-0.057

-0.074

  EVAt (Economic value added per sharet)

-0.006

-0.054

0.106

-0.057

0.145

-0.097

-0.076

  RCFt (Residual cash flow per sharet)

0.382

0.357

0.397

0.393

0.394

0.336

0.265

  ROIt (Return on investmentt)

0.062

0.060

0.058

0.007

0.083

0.104

0.046

  AROIt (S.S. adjusted return on investmentt)

0.168

0.143

0.175

0.103

0.054

0.167

0.217

  CFROIt (Cash flow return on investmentt)

0.101

0.109

0.196

0.079

0.065

0.093

0.112

  t End of current period.     S.S. = Stern Stewart

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXHIBIT 2
CORRELATIONS OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES WITH STOCK RETURN

 

All Years

Average

1995

1994

1993

1992

1991

  Sample Size

        1,625

 

    325

  325

  325

   325

   325

  OI/Pt-1 (Operating income after tax per sharet-1)

0.125

0.200

0.189

0.233

0.300

0.226

0.054

  AOI/Pt-1 (S.S. adjusted operating income after tax per sharet-1)

0.272

0.266

0.271

0.155

0.264

0.351

0.287

  CF/Pt-1 (Operating cash flow per sharet-1)

0.313

0.278

0.239

0.182

0.219

0.562

0.187

  RI/Pt-1 (Residual income per sharet-1)

0.040

0.106

0.142

0.150

0.164

0.070

0.005

  EVA/Pt-1 (Economic value added per sharet-1)

-0.064

-0.018

-0.098

0.057

0.078

-0.078

-0.051

  RCF/Pt-1 (Residual cash flow per sharet-1)

0.232

0.225

0.215

0.147

0.139

0.496

0.130

  ROI/Pt-1 (Return on investmentt-1)

0.096

0.123

0.096

0.156

0.131

0.074

0.156

  AROI/Pt-1 (S.S. adjusted return on investmentt-1)

0.130

0.000

0.144

0.214

0.027

-0.026

-0.360

  CFROI/Pt-1 (Cash flow return on investmentt-1)

0.107

0.150

0.144

0.131

0.049

0.143

0.282

  Returnt = (pricet - pricet-1 + dividendt)/pricet-1    Pt-1 = Beginning of period price.     t = End of current period.   

 

   

  t-1 = Beginning of current period.     S.S. = Stern Stewart

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As a result, operating cash flow and adjusted operating income reported the best-performing categories and have higher association to stock price and stock return compared to the others. Of the three new measurements, residual cash flow (RCF) is the only one that showed encouraging correlations. The more popular RI and ROI, and the most recently highly promoted EVA® and CFROI produced either insignificant or inconsistent correlations and therefore “indistinguishable in their relative lack of contribution to assessing firm value (41).”  

Cash flow ROI (CFROI) avoids accounting distortions by excluding depreciation. It also provides a moving target based on assumptions about reinvestment that may or may not be true. Also, CFROI does not eliminate the hurdle rate problem, in which companies set an acceptable rate of return and assess performance based on the actual rate achieved.  Thus, companies are discouraged from investing in projects that would be expected to achieve a lower return, compared to the presently employed assets, even if it exceeds the hurdle rate.  It would result in a greater positive cash flow for the company, but lower total rate on the portfolio of investments.  Because it lowers the overall performance evaluation criterion, it discourages approval of the project even though it would be beneficial to the whole company.

EVA®, on the other hand, includes depreciation twice in the earnings and investment portion. In addition, EVA® does not adequately consider the cost of capital in valuing stock, much like RI, and like CFROI, its target is based on assumptions about reinvestment.  Plus, contrary to the claims, and as proven by the analyses, it is not considerably associated with either stock returns or stock price but rather, “it drives stock prices (p. 41).” The authors then suggest residual cash flow (RCF) as the best choice to use in linking profit to capital and ultimately to market value. RCF maintains the advantages of using a cash-based and a residual-based measure. “The consideration of the cost of capital is present and subtracted from cash flow to arrive at a residual result (p. 43)” in dollars. The residual cash flow measure is consistent with capital asset investment planning and is already stated in terms of cash so adjustment to remove accounting distortions is not necessary. 

 

EVA Main Page Performance Measurements Main Page ROI Main Page

Google
 
Web maaw.info